By Jeanine Ibrahim | CNBC 
The case of Allen Stanford, a former billionaire who once allegedly  sealed a deal with blood and is currently serving a 110-year federal  prison sentence, could soon be back in the headlines. A federal judge  ruled last month that investors could proceed with a lawsuit that  alleges the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was negligent in  its handling of the fraud.
 Texas-born Robert Allen Stanford exuded wealth. At his height in  2008, he was one of the richest men in America, listed on the Forbes  400, and worth an estimated $2.2 billion. 
He defined conspicuous  consumption. In one three year period alone, he spent $100 million on  aircraft, which included helicopters and private Lear Jets. He even  spent $12 million lengthening his yacht by just 6 feet.  
As it happened, however, Stanford indulged in these perks with  ill-gotten gains. In early 2009, the scale and scope of Stanford's  extravagances finally caught up to him.
 Stanford was eventually convicted of selling fraudulent certificates of  deposit from his offshore bank on the island of Antigua in an  international $7 billion Ponzi scheme, a case that drew comparisons to  disgraced broker Bernie Madoff's multibillion dollar fraud. To date, none of the more than 20,000 investors he bilked have recovered any money.
 In their lawsuit, the investors claim that on four instances and as early as 1997, the SEC determined that Stanford was running a Ponzi scheme. Still, the agency  did not act accordingly and failed to notify the Securities Investor  Protection Corporation. Investigators did not bring charges against  Stanford until 2009, in the wake of the global financial crisis.
The  government moved to dismiss the case, but U.S. District Judge Robert  Scola rejected the motion. He ruled that if the SEC knew Stanford was  running a Ponzi scheme as alleged by plaintiffs, the agency was  obligated to report it. Scola added that the government could argue that  it did not know Stanford was running a fraud if and when the case moved  to summary judgment. 
 SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment to "American Greed."  Nonetheless, the attorney for the investors, Gaytri Kachroo, said the  ruling was significant. "It truly provides the investing public a  precedent and therefore the hope that a case against the SEC can succeed  if meritorious under the law," the lawyer said.
 A Conman's Bogus Empire of Epic Proportions 
Beyond fancy toys, Stanford bought a small island for $63 million. He  owned mansions in Houston, Antigua, and St. Croix. And in Coral Gables,  Fla. an enormous 18,000 square foot castle. It was fit for a king: the  property included 57 rooms, a tower and a moat. Yet after just one year  of living there, he grew tired of the sprawling estate - moving out and  having it demolished. 
He also loved the game of cricket. By  2008, he was considered the world's number one promoter of the sport,  even offering up a $20 million cash prize, the largest ever for a team  sporting event, for a match in London. 
Yet according to the U.S.  Attorney's office, Stanford was not playing with honest money. He got  it by siphoning off loans to himself, approximately $2.2 billion from  depositor's CD holdings, without ever revealing these loans to  investors. 
From Brash Texan to Big Money Banker 
 Stanford grew up in a small town 90 miles south of Dallas. Much like his home-state, everything about the man was Texas-sized.
Doug  Birdsong, who used to workout with Stanford, recalled him as a muscular  man, standing 6'5" and weighing about 330 pounds. "He was the biggest,  he was the best, and he was the boss," Birdsong told "American Greed."
His early business ventures ended in failure. After losing a string  of health clubs to bankruptcy in 1982 and racking up $13 million in  personal debt, Stanford took a few more stabs at entrepreneurship before  heading to the Caribbean, where he first entered banking.
 He founded "Stanford International Bank" in 1991 on Antigua. It was  there that he laid the foundation of his empire, becoming the island's  largest employer.
 He targeted wealthy Latin Americans worried about the stability of  their governments, and it worked. Within three years, the bank's assets  skyrocketed to $350 million.
One year later, he moved into the  U.S. market, establishing Stanford Financial Group in Houston. The  company became known for selling certificate of deposits (CDs).  Synonymous with safety, CDs seemed like a smart choice for potential  buyers. As Stanford's investors piled into these instruments, in less  than a decade the group grew to $3 billion.
Unwitting investors, however, had no idea that Stanford's CDs were anything but safe. 
A Scam from the Start
Yet  suspicions rose in 2005 when SEC investigators began taking a hard look  at Stanford Financial Group, specifically his Certificates of Deposit  from Antigua. Three years later, when two whistleblowers came forward,  the agency was handed hard proof of Stanford's fraud.
  Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Pelletier got the case from the SEC. He  landed a huge break when Jim Davis - Stanford's right-hand man since the  1980's and the company's chief financial officer - agreed to talk in  exchange for a reduced sentence.
 Davis confessed that from his first day on the job, the company  simply made up numbers and cooked the books. "That's what his job was as  CFO, and he continued to do that from 1987 or '88 all the way until  2009," Pelletier said.
When they first started the business, Davis said Stanford could do  whatever he wanted on Antigua. He had the island's chief banking  regulator in his back pocket. In a bizarre twist, the two even sealed a  bribery scheme deal by becoming "blood brothers," cutting their fingers  to mix their blood, according to Davis.
A decade-and-a-half after  Stanford Financial Group first opened its Houston headquarters, the SEC  shut its U.S. operations down. In June 2009, Stanford was mired in  charges of fraud, conspiracy to launder money and conspiracy to obstruct  justice.
Throughout his trial, however, the former high-flying  billionaire steadfastly maintained his innocence. He attempted to put  the blame on Davis, but a jury did not buy his story. This March, he was  found guilty on 13 counts, and later sentenced to more than a century  in prison.
Investors Devastated by Economic Homicide
 Many of the investors at the sentencing were satisfied, with Sandra Dorrell being one of them.
 In 2005, after selling off an office furniture business, she invested  her money in the Stanford Group's CDs. A single mother who was battling  a rare, life-threatening condition called Caroli's disease, she had  planned to use her investment to give her peace of mind and financial  security as she endured medical treatment.
 Instead, she lost every penny.
 "To lose $1.3 million to someone that absolutely stole the money from me is just horrific," Dorrell told CNBC's "American Greed."
 Fellow investor Cassie Wilkinson, who along with her husband lost six-figures to Stanford's treachery, agreed.
 "The sentencing for crimes like this has become so big and so long  that they're comparing it to economic homicide, and really, that's what  it is," she said. "Someone murdered the life that I knew, that I worked  hard for. We were not born with money; we earned every single penny,"  Wilkinson added.
 For 62-year-old Stanford, a projected release date of 2105 is a life  sentence -one that he deserves, according to many of his victims.
Hi Kate,
ReplyDeleteThank you for all the updates and for being so nice to keep up with this blog. Any word on when we may hear something from the Antigua liquidator?
Thank you!!!
I believe the Antigua liquidator will be making a press release on October 19th.
ReplyDelete